Use PiecewiseSequence for List take elements by danking · Pull Request #8833 · vortex-data/vortex

Performance Gate Passed

⚡ 12 improved benchmarks
✅ 1786 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 52 skipped benchmarks¹

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	`copy_nullable[65536]`	1.4 ms	1 ms	+32.01%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_slice_mask_random_indices[256, 50]`	119.2 µs	92.6 µs	+28.69%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_slice_mask_random_indices[768, 50]`	119.6 µs	93.4 µs	+28.05%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_small_random_mask_random_indices[256, 10]`	116.2 µs	91 µs	+27.69%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_small_uncached_random_mask_random_indices[256, 10]`	116.9 µs	91.6 µs	+27.6%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_nullable_random_mask_random_indices[256, 50]`	128.5 µs	100.7 µs	+27.56%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_random_mask_random_indices[256, 50]`	122.6 µs	96.5 µs	+27.07%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_nullable_random_mask_random_indices[768, 50]`	132.6 µs	104.6 µs	+26.73%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_small_random_mask_random_indices[768, 10]`	120.3 µs	95 µs	+26.6%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_small_uncached_random_mask_random_indices[768, 10]`	120.1 µs	94.9 µs	+26.55%
⚡	Simulation	`take_filter_list_random_mask_random_indices[768, 50]`	127 µs	100.4 µs	+26.51%
⚡	Simulation	`copy_non_nullable[65536]`	1,089.5 µs	908.8 µs	+19.89%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

_{Comparing codex/list-take-piecewise-elements (243ed19) with codex/piecewise-sequential-run-take-consumers (e4a0543)}

52 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩