Add PiecewiseSequence take microbenchmarks by danking · Pull Request #8830 · vortex-data/vortex

Performance Gate Passed

✅ 1798 untouched benchmarks
🆕 30 new benchmarks
⏩ 52 skipped benchmarks¹

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
🆕	Simulation	`optimized_constant_lengths[1]`	N/A	53.6 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`optimized_constant_lengths[1024]`	N/A	7.9 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`optimized_constant_lengths[16]`	N/A	10 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`optimized_constant_lengths[256]`	N/A	8 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`optimized_constant_lengths[4]`	N/A	16.5 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`optimized_constant_lengths[64]`	N/A	8.3 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`prebuilt_dense_lengths[1]`	N/A	59.7 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`prebuilt_dense_lengths[1024]`	N/A	7.9 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`prebuilt_dense_lengths[16]`	N/A	10.4 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`prebuilt_dense_lengths[256]`	N/A	8 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`prebuilt_dense_lengths[4]`	N/A	18 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`prebuilt_dense_lengths[64]`	N/A	8.4 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`reify_constant_lengths_then_take[1]`	N/A	63.7 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`reify_constant_lengths_then_take[1024]`	N/A	7.9 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`reify_constant_lengths_then_take[16]`	N/A	10.5 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`reify_constant_lengths_then_take[256]`	N/A	8 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`reify_constant_lengths_then_take[4]`	N/A	18.8 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`reify_constant_lengths_then_take[64]`	N/A	8.5 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`cursor_copy_safe[1000]`	N/A	6.7 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	`cursor_copy_safe[10000]`	N/A	14.2 µs	N/A
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

_{Comparing codex/piecewise-sequence-benchmarks (388d234) with codex/piecewise-sequential-run-take-consumers (e4a0543)}

52 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩