Backport 14.8 - 14.9 changes#1843
Open
reshke wants to merge 45 commits into
Open
Conversation
Fix a link from the "Heap-Only Tuples" documentation section. Previously, its "fillfactor" link pointed to the "CREATE TABLE" command's documentation. Now the link directly points to the fillfactor storage parameter documentation (which is about half way into the "CREATE TABLE" sect1). Oversight in commit 115464b. Backpatch: 12-, the first version with a usable reloption link.
fuzzystrmatch's difference() function assumes that _soundex() always initializes its output buffer fully. This was not so for the case of a string containing no alphabetic characters, resulting in unstable output and Valgrind complaints. Fix by using memset() to fill the whole buffer in the early-exit case. Also make some cosmetic improvements (I didn't care for the random switches between "instr[0]" and "*instr" notation). Report and diagnosis by Alexander Lakhin (bug #17935). Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17935-b99316aa79c18513@postgresql.org
When merging BRIN summaries, union_tuples() did not correctly update the target hasnulls/allnulls flags. When merging all-NULL summary into a summary without any NULL values, the result had both flags set to false (instead of having hasnulls=true). This happened because the code only considered the hasnulls flags, ignoring the possibility the source summary has allnulls=true. Discovered while investigating issues with handling empty BRIN ranges and handling of NULL values, but it's a separate problem (has nothing to do with empty ranges). Fixed by considering both flags on the source summary, and updating the hasnulls flag on the target summary. Backpatch to 11. The bug exists since 9.5 (where BRIN indexes were introduced), but those releases are EOL already. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9d993d0d-e431-2196-9ccc-0554d0e60154%40enterprisedb.com
Non-leaf pages of GiST indexes contain key attributes, leaf pages contain both key and non-key attributes, and gist_page_items() ignored the handling of non-key attributes. This caused a few problems when using gist_page_items() on a GiST index with INCLUDE: - On a non-leaf page, the function would crash. - On a leaf page, the function would work, but miss to display all the values for included attributes. This commit fixes gist_page_items() to handle such cases in a more appropriate way, and now displays the values of key and non-key attributes for each item separately in a style consistent with what ruleutils.c would generate for the attribute list, depending on the page type dealt with. In a way similar to how a record is displayed, values would be double-quoted for key or non-key attributes if required. ruleutils.c did not provide a routine able to control if non-key attributes should be displayed, so an extended() routine for index definitions is added to work around the leaf and non-leaf page differences. While on it, this commit fixes a third problem related to the amount of data reported for key attributes. The code originally relied on BuildIndexValueDescription() (used for error reports on constraints) that would not print all the data stored in the index but the index opclass's input type, so this limited the amount of information available. This switch makes gist_page_items() much cheaper as there is no need to run ACL checks for each item printed, which is not an issue anyway as superuser rights are required to execute the functions of pageinspect. Opclasses whose data cannot be displayed can rely on gist_page_items_bytea(). The documentation of this function was slightly incorrect for the output results generated on HEAD and v15, so adjust it on these branches. Author: Alexander Lakhin, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17884-cb8c326522977acb@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 14
Commits 681d9e4 et al added a test case in namespace.sql that implicitly relied on there not being a table "public.abc". However, the concurrently-run transactions.sql test creates precisely such a table, so with the right timing you'd get a failure. Creating a table named as generically as "abc" in a common schema seems like bad practice, so fix this by changing the name of transactions.sql's table. (Compare 2cf8c7a.) Marina Polyakova Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/80d0201636665d82185942e7112257b4@postgrespro.ru
Avoid "right sibling's left-link doesn't match" errors when vacuuming a corrupt nbtree index. Just LOG the issue and press on. That way VACUUM will have a decent chance of finishing off all required processing for the index (and for the table as a whole). This error was seen in the field from time to time (it's more than a theoretical risk), so giving VACUUM the ability to press on like this has real value. Nothing short of a REINDEX is expected to fix the underlying index corruption, so giving up (by throwing an error) risks making a bad situation far worse. Anything that blocks forward progress by VACUUM like this might go unnoticed for a long time. This could eventually lead to a wraparound/xidStopLimit outage. Note that _bt_unlink_halfdead_page() has always been able to bail on page deletion when the target page's left sibling page was in an inconsistent state. It now does the same thing (returns false to back out of the second phase of deletion) when it notices sibling link corruption in the target page's right sibling page. This is similar to the work from commit 5b861ba (later backpatched as commit 43e409ce), which taught nbtree to press on with vacuuming an index when page deletion fails to "re-find" a downlink in the target page's parent page. The "re-find" check seems to make VACUUM bail on page deletion more often in practice, but there is no reason to take any chances here. Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Reviewed-By: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzko2q2kP1+UvgJyP9g0mF4hopK0NtQZcxwvMv9_ytGhkQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 11- (all supported versions).
Backpatch-through: 11
A new-style SQL function can contain a parse-time dependency on a unique index, much as views and matviews can (such cases arise from GROUP BY and ON CONFLICT clauses, for example). To dump and restore such a function successfully, pg_dump must postpone the function until after the unique index is created, which will happen in the post-data part of the dump. Therefore we have to remove the normal constraint that functions are dumped in pre-data. Add code similar to the existing logic that handles this for matviews. I added test cases for both as well, since code coverage tests showed that we weren't testing the matview logic. Per report from Sami Imseih. Back-patch to v14 where new-style SQL functions came in. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2C1933AB-C2F8-499B-9D18-4AC1882256A0@amazon.com
5.14 Dependency Tracking was not updated when we added new-style SQL functions. Improve that. Noted by Sami Imseih. Back-patch to v14 where new-style SQL functions came in. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2C1933AB-C2F8-499B-9D18-4AC1882256A0@amazon.com
Commit fc22b66 (generated columns) replaced ExecGetUpdatedCols() with ExecGetAllUpdatedCols() in a couple places handling UPDATE (triggers and lock mode). However, ExecGetUpdatedCols() did exec_rt_fetch() while ExecGetAllUpdatedCols() also allocates memory through bms_union() without paying attention to the memory context and happened to use the long-lived ExecutorState, leaking the memory until the end of the query. The amount of leaked memory is proportional to the number of (updated) attributes, types of UPDATE triggers, and the number of processed rows (which for UPDATE ... FROM ... may be much higher than updated rows). Fixed by switching to the per-tuple context in GetAllUpdatedColumns(). This is fine for all in-core callers, but external callers may need to copy the result. But we're not aware of any such callers. Note the issue was introduced by fc22b66, but the macros were later renamed by f50e888990. Backpatch to 12, where the issue was introduced. Reported-by: Tomas Vondra Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Tom Lane, Jakub Wartak Backpatch-through: 12 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/222a3442-7f7d-246c-ed9b-a76209d19239@enterprisedb.com
In the documentation, previously the example command for ALTER FOREIGN TABLE ... OPTIONS incorrectly included both the option name and value with the DROP operation. The correct syntax for the DROP operation requires only the name of the option to be specified. This commit fixes the example by removing the option value from the DROP operation. Back-patch to all supported versions. Author: Mehmet Emin KARAKAS <emin100@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANQrdXAHzbcEYhjGoe5A42OmfvdQhHFJzyKj9gJvHuDKyOF5Ng@mail.gmail.com
…uster This commit refactors a bit the code in charge of checking for log patterns when connections fail or succeed, by moving the log pattern checks into their own routine, for clarity. This has come up as something to improve while discussing the refactoring of find_in_log(). Backpatch down to 14 where these routines are used, to ease the introduction of new tests that could rely on them. Author: Vignesh C, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm0YSiLpjCmajwLfidQrFOrLNKPQir7s__PeVvh9U3uoTQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 14
This commit fixes an oversight introduced in 10520f4, that has added delayChkptEnd to PGPROC to avoid ABI breakages on stable branches, where two spots have missed to initialize this variable (delayChkpt was switched back from int to bool, and it was initialized as 0 so there was no consequences for it): - InitProcess(), where the per-process data structures of a backend are initialized. - InitAuxiliaryProcess(), same but for auxiliary processes. An interruption during relation truncation while this flag is set could cause an assertion failure when a follow-up process does a relation truncation while reusing the same PGPROC entry. A second effect could be incorrect checkpoint end delays. While on it, add an assertion in ProcArrayClearTransaction() for delayChkptEnd to be in line with 5788e25. This is needed only for v14. This issue affects v11~v14, but not v15~, as we use a single field called delayChkptFlags to delay checkpoints there. Author: suyu.cmj (mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com) Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9c3d2a49-db5f-43cb-840b-d58f9a684295.mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com Backpatch-through: 11
isspace() can be locale-sensitive depending on the platform, causing hstore to consider as whitespaces characters it should not see as such. For example, U+0105, being decoded as 0xC4 0x85 in UTF-8, would be discarded from the input given. This problem is similar to 9ae2661, though it was missed that hstore can also manipulate non-ASCII inputs, so replace the existing isspace() calls with scanner_isspace(). This problem exists for a long time, so backpatch all the way down. Author: Evan Jones Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HWA9awUW0+RV_gO9r1ABZwGoZxPztcJxPy8vMFSTbTfi4jig@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 11
Commit 927d9ab purported to make datetime() accept any string that could be output for a datetime value by to_jsonb(). But it overlooked the possibility of fractional seconds being present, so that cases as simple as to_jsonb(now()) would defeat it. Fix by adding formats that include ".US" to the list in executeDateTimeMethod(). (Note that while this is nominally microseconds, it'll do the right thing for fractions with fewer than six digits.) In passing, re-order the list to restore the datatype ordering specified in its comment. The violation accidentally did not break anything; but the next edit might be less lucky, so add more comments. Per report from Tim Field. Back-patch to v13 where datetime() was added, like the previous patch. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/014A028B-5CE6-4FDF-AC24-426CA6FC9CEE@mohiohio.com
rewriteRuleAction neglected to check for SubLink nodes in the securityQuals of range table entries. This could lead to failing to convert such a SubLink to a SubPlan, resulting in assertion crashes or weird errors later in planning. In passing, fix some poor coding in rewriteTargetView: we should not pass the source parsetree's hasSubLinks field to ReplaceVarsFromTargetList's outer_hasSubLinks. ReplaceVarsFromTargetList knows enough to ignore that when a Query node is passed, but it's still confusing and bad precedent: if we did try to update that flag we'd be updating a stale copy of the parsetree. Per bug #17972 from Alexander Lakhin. This has been broken since we added RangeTblEntry.securityQuals (although the presented test case only fails back to 215b43c), so back-patch all the way. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17972-f422c094237847d0@postgresql.org
As gist__int_ops stands in intarray, it is possible to store GiST entries for leaf pages that can cause corruptions when decompressed. Leaf nodes are stored as decompressed all the time by the compression method, and the decompression method should map with that, retrieving the contents of the page without doing any decompression. However, the code authorized the insertion of leaf page data with a higher number of array items than what can be supported, generating a NOTICE message to inform about this matter (199 for a 8k page, for reference). When calling the decompression method, a decompression would be attempted on this leaf node item but the contents should be retrieved as they are. The NOTICE message generated when dealing with the compression of a leaf page and too many elements in the input array for gist__int_ops has been introduced by 08ee64e, removing the marker stored in the array to track if this is actually a leaf node. However, it also missed the fact that the decompression path should do nothing for a leaf page. Hence, as the code stand, a too-large array would be stored as uncompressed but the decompression path would attempt a decompression rather that retrieving the contents as they are. This leads to various problems. First, even if 08ee64e tried to address that, it is possible to do out-of-bound chunk writes with a large input array, with the backend informing about that with WARNINGs. On decompression, retrieving the stored leaf data would lead to incorrect memory reads, leading to crashes or even worse. Perhaps somebody would be interested in expanding the number of array items that can be handled in a leaf page for this operator in the future, which would require revisiting the choice done in 08ee64e, but based on the lack of reports about this problem since 2005 it does not look so. For now, this commit prevents the insertion of data for leaf pages when using more array items that the code can handle on decompression, switching the NOTICE message to an ERROR. If one wishes to use more array items, gist__intbig_ops is an optional choice. While on it, use ERRCODE_PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED as error code when a limit is reached, because that's what the module is facing in such cases. Author: Ankit Kumar Pandey, Alexander Lakhin Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/796b65c3-57b7-bddf-b0d5-a8afafb8b627@gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17888-f72930e6b5ce8c14@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 11
Back-patch down to 11. Author: Sho Kato (<kato-sho@fujitsu.com>) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYCPR01MB68499042A33BC32241193AAF9F5BA%40TYCPR01MB6849.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Here we adjust relation_has_unique_index_for() so that it no longer makes use of partial unique indexes as uniqueness proofs. It is incorrect to use these as the predicates used by check_index_predicates() to set predOK makes use of not only baserestrictinfo quals as proofs, but also qual from join conditions. For relation_has_unique_index_for()'s case, we need to know the relation is unique for a given set of columns before any joins are evaluated, so if predOK was only set to true due to some join qual, then it's unsafe to use such indexes in relation_has_unique_index_for(). The final plan may not even make use of that index, which could result in reading tuples that are not as unique as the planner previously expected them to be. Bug: #17975 Reported-by: Tor Erik Linnerud Backpatch-through: 11, all supported versions Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17975-98a90c156f25c952%40postgresql.org
This is a follow-up of f663b00, that has been committed to v13 and v14, tweaking the TAP test for two-phase transactions so as it provides coverage for the bug that has been fixed. This change is done in its own commit for clarity, as v15 and HEAD did not show the problematic behavior, still missed coverage for it. While on it, this adds a comment about the dependency of the last partial segment rename and RecoverPreparedTransactions() at the end of recovery, as that can be easy to miss. Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/743b9b45a2d4013bd90b6a5cba8d6faeb717ee34.camel@cybertec.at Backpatch-through: 13
If the inner-side expressions contain PARAM_EXEC Params, we must re-hash whenever the values of those Params change. The executor mechanism for that exists already, but we failed to invoke it because finalize_plan() neglected to search the Hash.hashkeys field for Params. This allowed a previous scan's hash table to be re-used when it should not be, leading to rows missing from the join's output. (I believe incorrectly-included join rows are impossible however, since checking the real hashclauses would reject false matches.) This bug is very ancient, dating probably to d24d75f of 7.4. Sadly, this simple fix depends on the plan representational changes made by 2abd7ae, so it will only work back to v12. I thought about trying to make some kind of hack for v11, but I'm leery of putting code significantly different from what is used in the newer branches into a nearly-EOL branch. Seeing that the bug escaped detection for a full twenty years, problematic cases must be rare; so I don't feel too awful about leaving v11 as-is. Per bug #17985 from Zuming Jiang. Back-patch to v12. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17985-748b66607acd432e@postgresql.org
The existing errhint message and docs were missing the fact that we can't disassociate from the slot unless the subscription is disabled. Author: Robert Sjöblom, Peter Smith Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 11 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/807bdf85-61ea-88e2-5712-6d9fcd4eabff@fortnox.se
This partially reverts 68cb5af, as using archiving to enforce the rename of the last partial segment of the old timeline at promotion to use .partial as suffix is impacting the tests when it does switchovers. As showed by the logs gathered by the CI in the tests that failed, a new standby may fail to find the WAL segment it needs to follow a promoted instance with its timeline jump, as it got renamed to .partial. This problem would manifest as a run timeout with 009_twophase.pl, as the new standby repeatedly requests a segment from the promoted primary that it would not find. Reported-by: Nathan Bossart Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230621043345.GA787473@nathanxps13 Backpatch-through: 13
exec_parse_message() wants to create a cached plan in all cases, including for empty input. The empty-input path does not have a test for being in an aborted transaction, making it possible that plancache.c will fail due to trying to do database lookups even though there's no real work to do. One solution would be to throw an aborted-transaction error in this path too, but it's not entirely clear whether the lack of such an error was intentional or whether some clients might be relying on non-error behavior. Instead, let's hack plancache.c so that it treats empty statements with the same logic it already had for transaction control commands, ensuring that it can soldier through even in an already-aborted transaction. Per bug #17983 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17983-da4569fcb878672e@postgresql.org
Reported-by: Pierre <pbaumard@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/168724660637.399156.7642965215720120947@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 11
Avoid "right sibling %u of block %u is not next child" errors when vacuuming a corrupt nbtree index. Just LOG the issue and press on. That way VACUUM will have a decent chance of finishing off all required processing for the index (and for the table as a whole). This is similar to recent work from commit 5abff19, as well as work from commit 5b861ba (later backpatched as commit 43e409ce), which taught nbtree VACUUM to keep going when its "re-find" check fails. The hardening added by this commit takes place directly after the "re-find" check, right before the critical section for the first stage of page deletion. Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=dayg0vjs4+er84TS9ami=csdzjpuiCGbEw=idhwqhzQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 11- (all supported versions).
Statistics defined by the CREATE STATISTICS command are only used to assist with the selectivity estimations of base relations, never for joins. Here we mention this fact in the notes section of the CREATE STATISTICS command. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrMuVgDOrmg_EtFDZ=AOovq6EsJNnHH1ddyZ8EqL4yzMw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 11
By default, triggers and rules do not fire on a logical replication subscriber based on the "session_replication_role" GUC being set to "replica". However, the docs in the logical replication section assumed that the reader understood how this GUC worked. This modifies the docs to be more explicit and links back to the GUC itself. Author: Jonathan Katz, Peter Smith Reviewed-by: Vignesh C, Euler Taveira Backpatch-through: 11 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5bb2c9a2-499f-e1a2-6e33-5ce96b35cc4a@postgresql.org
One of the tests for the pipeline mode with portal description expects a non-NULL PQgetResult, but used an incorrect error message on failure, telling that PQgetResult being NULL was the expected result. Author: Jelte Fennema Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQTkShHecFF+EZrm94Lbsu2ej569T=bz+PjMbw9Aiioxuw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 14
Reported-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZJTzwD2rTbHWWQ9g@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 11
TParserGet() recurses for some token types, meaning it's possible to drive it to stack overflow. Since this is a minority behavior, I chose to add the check_stack_depth() call to the two places that recurse rather than doing it during every single call. While at it, add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), because this can run unpleasantly long for long inputs. Per bug #17995 from Zuming Jiang. This is old, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17995-9f20ff3e6389db4c@postgresql.org
…CH PARTITION A portion of ALTER TABLE .. ATTACH PARTITION is to ensure that the partition being attached to the partitioned table has a correct set of indexes, so as there is a consistent index mapping between the partitioned table and its new-to-be partition. However, as introduced in 8b08f7d, the current logic could choose an invalid index as a match, which is something that can exist when dealing with more than two levels of partitioning, like attaching a partitioned table (that has partitions, with an index created by CREATE INDEX ON ONLY) to another partitioned table. A partitioned index with indisvalid set to false is equivalent to an incomplete partition tree, meaning that an invalid partitioned index does not have indexes defined in all its partitions. Hence, choosing an invalid partitioned index can create inconsistent partition index trees, where the parent attaching to is valid, but its partition may be invalid. In the report from Alexander Lakhin, this showed up as an assertion failure when validating an index. Without assertions enabled, the partition index tree would be actually broken, as indisvalid should be switched to true for a partitioned index once all its partitions are themselves valid. With two levels of partitioning, the top partitioned table used a valid index and was able to link to an invalid index stored on its partition, itself a partitioned table. I have studied a few options here (like the possibility to switch indisvalid to false for the parent), but came down to the conclusion that we'd better rely on a simple rule: invalid indexes had better never be chosen, so as the partition attached uses and creates indexes that the parent expects. Some regression tests are added to provide some coverage. Note that the existing coverage is not impacted. This is a problem since partitioned indexes exist, so backpatch all the way down to v11. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin Discussion: https://postgr.es/14987634-43c0-0cb3-e075-94d423607e08@gmail.com Backpatch-through: 11
Oversight in 6b4d23f. Author: Japin Li, Richard Guo Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/MEYP282MB1669FC91C764E277821936D3B624A@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Backpatch-through: 14
This should have been part of dc73db6, but it got lost in the mix. Oversight in 6b4d23f. Author: Japin Li Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/MEYP282MB1669FC91C764E277821936D3B624A@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Backpatch-through: 14
It was walking into the ColumnDef->compression field, which is not a node but a string. This code is currently not reachable (because the compression field is only set in situations that don't go through raw_expression_tree_walker()), but if it had been, this could have behaved erratically.
If the given composite datum is toasted out-of-line, DatumGetHeapTupleHeader will perform database accesses to detoast it. That can invalidate the result of get_cached_rowtype, as documented (perhaps not plainly enough) in that function's API spec; which leads to strange errors or crashes when we try to use the TupleDesc to read the tuple. In short then, trying to update a field of a composite column could fail intermittently if the overall column value is wide enough to require toasting. We can fix the bug at no cost by just changing the order of operations, since we don't need the TupleDesc until after detoasting. (Other callers of get_cached_rowtype appear to get this right already, so there's only one bug.) Note that the added regression test case reveals this bug reliably only with debug_discard_caches/CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS. Per bug #17994 from Alexander Lakhin. Sadly, this patch does not fix the missing-values issue revealed in the bug discussion; we'll need some more work to cover that. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17994-5c7100b51b4790e9@postgresql.org
The logic that introduced partitioned indexes missed a few things when invalidating a partitioned index when these are created, still the code is written to handle recursions: 1) If created from scratch because a mapping index could not be found, the new index created could be itself invalid, if for example it was a partitioned index with one of its leaves invalid. 2) A CCI was missing when indisvalid is set for a parent index, leading to inconsistent trees when recursing across more than one level for a partitioned index creation if an invalidation of the parent was required. This could lead to the creation of a partition index tree where some of the partitioned indexes are marked as invalid, but some of the parents are marked valid, which is not something that should happen (as validatePartitionedIndex() defines, indisvalid is switched to true for a partitioned index iff all its partitions are themselves valid). This patch makes sure that indisvalid is set to false on a partitioned index if at least one of its partition is invalid. The flag is set to true if *all* its partitions are valid. The regression test added in this commit abuses of a failed concurrent index creation, marked as invalid, that maps with an index created on its partitioned table afterwards. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14987634-43c0-0cb3-e075-94d423607e08@gmail.com Backpatch-through: 11
Backpatch-through: 14 only
The Incremental Sort had a couple issues, resulting in leaking memory during rescans, possibly triggering OOM. The code had a couple of related flaws: 1. During rescans, the sort states were reset but then also set to NULL (despite the comment saying otherwise). ExecIncrementalSort then sees NULL and initializes a new sort state, leaking the memory used by the old one. 2. Initializing the sort state also automatically rebuilt the info about presorted keys, leaking the already initialized info. presorted_keys was also unnecessarily reset to NULL. Patch by James Coleman, based on patches by Laurenz Albe and Tom Lane. Backpatch to 13, where Incremental Sort was introduced. Author: James Coleman, Laurenz Albe, Tom Lane Reported-by: Laurenz Albe, Zu-Ming Jiang Backpatch-through: 13 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b2bd02dff61af15e3526293e2771f874cf2a3be7.camel%40cybertec.at Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/db03c582-086d-e7cd-d4a1-3bc722f81765%40inf.ethz.ch
Commit f245236 fixed a memory leak by moving the modifiedCols bitmap into the per-row memory context. In the case of AFTER UPDATE triggers, the bitmap is however referenced from an event kept until the end of the query, resulting in a use-after-free bug. Fixed by copying the bitmap into the AfterTriggerEvents memory context, which is the one where we keep the trigger events. There's only one place that needs to do the copy, but the memory context may not exist yet. Doing that in a separate function seems more readable. Report by Alexander Pyhalov, fix by me. Backpatch to 13, where the bitmap was added to the event by commit 71d60e2. Reported-by: Alexander Pyhalov Backpatch-through: 13 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/acddb17c89b0d6cb940eaeda18c08bbe@postgrespro.ru
When set, this environment variable was only effective for data directories but not for all the other temporary files created by PostgreSQL::Test::Utils. Keeping the temporary files after a successful run can be useful for debugging purposes. The documentation is updated to reflect the new behavior, with contents available in doc/ since v16 and in src/test/perl/README since v15. Author: Jacob Champion Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAWbhmgHtDH1SGZ+Fw05CsXtE0mzTmjbuUxLB9mY9iPKgM6cUw@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YyPd9unV14SX2bLF@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 11
Creation of a file with a very long name can create problems on Windows due to its file path limits. Work around that by creating the file via a symlink with a shorter name. Error displayed by buildfarm animal fairywren.o Backpatch to all live branches
Commit 83ed4de20f inadvertently used the new package names. In version 14 or older, use TestLib intead of using PostgreSQL::Test::Utils
The test inserted 70k rows into a foreign table, in order to verify correct behavior with more than 65535 parameters, and was added in response to a bug report. However, this is rather expensive, especially when running the tests under valgrind, CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS etc. It doesn't seem worth it to keep running the test, so remove it from all branches (14+). Backpatch-through: 14 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2131017.1623451468@sss.pgh.pa.us
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
12 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #ISSUE_Number
What does this PR do?
Type of Change
Breaking Changes
Test Plan
make installcheckmake -C src/test installcheck-cbdb-parallelImpact
Performance:
User-facing changes:
Dependencies:
Checklist
Additional Context
CI Skip Instructions